From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvanhensbergen@us.ibm.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: A new direction for vmchannel?
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:37:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497A005E.8000701@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090123171251.GB3622@x200.localdomain>
Chris Wright wrote:
> * Anthony Liguori (aliguori@us.ibm.com) wrote:
>
>> The userspace configuration aspects of the current implementation of
>> vmchannel are pretty annoying. Moreover, we would like to make use of
>> something like vmchannel in a kernel driver and I fear that it's going
>> to be difficult to do that.
>>
>
> What's the use for vmchannel from kernel driver?
>
Well, it doesn't exactly have to be vmchannel, but the desire is to have
the management tools to be able to communicate directly with a kernel
driver. We could certainly just use virtio and route it through QEMU to
the management tool. It would be useful to just use vmchannel though.
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> Heh, works for me ;-) Last time I suggested an fs it got shot down due to
> the burden it puts on the guest implementation (notably windows and
> other guests and ease of adding a new fs implementation).
>
> Doesn't directly solve addressing (IOW, easy to do with hierarchical
> namespace, but if vmchannel ever talks guest-to-guest...). Clearly not
> a huge issue.
>
> Should handle the reliable messaging bit (one big push for using tcp),
> and has advantage of being a structured protocol.
>
> Has the similar ABI issue that we see in Linux with sysfs, namely it's
> easy to screw up...but that is manageable.
>
> BTW, what ever happened to just using a serial device (granted needs
> some protocol layered on top...)?
>
I think you end up having a lot of the same issues with respect to
making it transparent to the guest. You could still do 9p over serial
and still use a synthetic file system in the guest. In fact, this is a
pretty reasonable thing to do for older kernel guests and even Windows.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> thanks,
> -chris
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-23 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-23 14:45 [Qemu-devel] A new direction for vmchannel? Anthony Liguori
2009-01-23 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Chris Wright
2009-01-23 17:37 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-01-23 20:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-01-23 20:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-24 0:02 ` Dor Laor
2009-01-24 10:22 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-24 22:28 ` Dor Laor
2009-01-24 17:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-01-24 17:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-24 18:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-01-24 18:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-24 19:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-24 21:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-01-24 21:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-25 14:16 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-01-25 17:58 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497A005E.8000701@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=ericvanhensbergen@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).