From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRXLL-0007ct-Gm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:41:59 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRXLK-0007cI-SU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:41:59 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40565 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRXLK-0007cA-N6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:41:58 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f20.google.com ([209.85.221.20]:37415) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRXLK-00016O-BE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:41:58 -0500 Received: by qyk13 with SMTP id 13so9737661qyk.10 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:41:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <497E11F7.7090802@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:41:43 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] build system: Further improve quiet mode References: <497C9398.3060006@web.de> <497DF491.4010808@codemonkey.ws> <200901261858.19098.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200901261858.19098.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paul Brook wrote: >> BTW, what do people think of printing CFLAGS? I find it not all that >> exciting but if people like it, I'm happy to go with it. >> > > I don't find it that interesting either. Especially given we use at least two > different sets of CFLAGS, and you really also need to know which compiler is > being invoked. You can always use V=1. > That was my thinking too. The more noise in the build output, the less useful the quiet mode is wrt catching warnings. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Paul >