From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LScnp-0001dp-TO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:43:53 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LScnn-0001cs-RO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:43:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58435 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LScnn-0001cp-Mn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:43:51 -0500 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:54495) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LScnn-0006jt-BU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:43:51 -0500 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0TJiCoF028837 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:44:12 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n0TJhjKu176676 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:43:45 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0TJgl6I031513 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:42:47 -0500 Message-ID: <498206E2.4030909@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:43:30 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MTRR support on x86, part 2 References: <497E4A30.7070103@gmx.net> <4981E12E.3030100@us.ibm.com> <200901291237.08808.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200901291237.08808.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jung-uk Kim Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 29 January 2009 12:02 pm, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> As best as I can tell, there is no change here. I removed it from >> the diff and applied the rest. >> > > It's funny I had the same thought when the patch showed up. Then, I > looked closer and found something different: "mttr" -> "mtrr". ;-) > Yeah, I guess I missed that. I'll fix it. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Jung-uk Kim >