From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LSdwN-00051c-3n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:56:47 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LSdwL-00050H-EN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:56:46 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48055 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSdwL-0004zy-59
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:56:45 -0500
Received: from mail-ew0-f15.google.com ([209.85.219.15]:43788)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1LSdwK-0004Rl-Ne
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:56:44 -0500
Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so241863ewy.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <498217F7.80004@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:56:23 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Mingw GCC not recognising printf format "%I64u"
References: <1987955410-BeMail@laptop>	<4981B0C9.8010403@codemonkey.ws>	<20090129135523.GA7441@shareable.org>	<4981C49E.5070207@codemonkey.ws>	<20090129184234.GA13169@shareable.org>	<49820879.5080209@codemonkey.ws>
	<glt4fq$72a$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <glt4fq$72a$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Consul wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Okay, I wrote a small program that included inttypes.h.  PRIu64 was 
>> defined as I64u.
>
> This bug should be fixed in GCC-4.4.0 (and backported to 3.4.2 MinGW's 
> stable) However the latest version ported to MinGW  is still 4.3.0. 
> Mind you I64u in the format line still gives the correct result, only 
> this annoying warning is the problem. Other suggested format options 
> silenced the warning, but also truncated the result :(

Okay, then we can just ignore it for now.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> #include<stdio.h>
> #include<inttypes.h>
> //#define PRIu64 "I64u"
> int main() {
>     unsigned __int64 x = 1122334455667788LL;
>     printf("Number: %"PRIu64"\n", x);
>     return 0;
> }
>
>
>