From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LVMN1-0003FQ-0Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:47:31 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LVMMz-0003FE-BG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:47:29 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41188 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVMMz-0003FB-5Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:47:29 -0500
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:54332)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1LVMMy-0002mM-OP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:47:29 -0500
Message-ID: <498BF938.80206@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:47:52 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1233832126-9046-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
	<498B633C.1010105@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <498B633C.1010105@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] Unify memory allocation failure
	handling
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> Did you do this all by hand or were scripts involved?

By hand, armed only with my trusty grep.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.