From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LW8qp-0001z3-KW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:33:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LW8qo-0001xn-3w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:33:31 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34352 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LW8qn-0001xf-W4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:33:30 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:37927) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LW8qn-00017W-13 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:33:29 -0500 Received: from smtp05.web.de (fmsmtp05.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.4.166]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F511FA1F7A8 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:33:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from [88.65.43.151] (helo=[192.168.1.198]) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1LW8qg-0000WA-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:33:22 +0100 Message-ID: <498ED10F.2020600@web.de> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:33:19 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090208213637.e76e8fd7.mle+tools@mega-nerd.com> <20090208220520.6b3238ac.mle+tools@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <20090208220520.6b3238ac.mle+tools@mega-nerd.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig04119E4F0C184BD579ACCD7D" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: ACPI weirdness with SVN head Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig04119E4F0C184BD579ACCD7D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >=20 >> Is this a known problem? >=20 > More info. If I disable ACPI with -no-acpi the VM boots but > then chews up far more of the host CPU than previously. The > only real explanation I can find for this on the guest side > is a very high number of timer interrupts: >=20 > guest > cat /proc/interrupts=20 > CPU0 =20 > 0: 2575369 XT-PIC-XT timer > 1: 9 XT-PIC-XT i8042 > 2: 0 XT-PIC-XT cascade > 4: 536 XT-PIC-XT serial > 8: 0 XT-PIC-XT rtc0 > 9: 0 XT-PIC-XT virtio0 > 11: 202 XT-PIC-XT virtio1, eth0 > 12: 111 XT-PIC-XT i8042 > 14: 4176 XT-PIC-XT ata_piix > 15: 3676 XT-PIC-XT ata_piix > NMI: 0 Non-maskable interrupts > LOC: 0 Local timer interrupts > RES: 0 Rescheduling interrupts > CAL: 0 function call interrupts > TLB: 0 TLB shootdowns > TRM: 0 Thermal event interrupts > THR: 0 Threshold APIC interrupts > SPU: 0 Spurious interrupts > ERR: 0 >=20 > Cheers, > Erik I stumbled over the same problem with one of my Linux guests [1], but as the one that locked up was built without CONFIG_ACPI, I concluded that this is the problem (it missed that pin1 became 2, just like your guest does). Have you updated your BIOS image? Jan [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/37767 --------------enig04119E4F0C184BD579ACCD7D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmO0RQACgkQniDOoMHTA+mKrQCeKAvw7NCMWM8UT1wnu0zXNh3b 8t0Anj3X6WI1GVcLRrpH/oBXx6wLuop1 =OPIm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig04119E4F0C184BD579ACCD7D--