Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>]

Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 14:48 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> What do people think?  TCG seems to be in a good place.  We've got 
>> virtio, KVM, live migration, tons of new devices, bsd-user, etc.
>>
>> We could decide to cut one by the end of the month.  I'm already doing 
>> some test work in QEMU so I can follow up with some more detailed notes 
>> about what is working and what isn't working.  That gives us some time 
>> to decide if there's anything we need to fix before a release.
>>     
>
> Sounds great to me.
>
> >From a Fedora perspective, qemu-0.9.1 is a year old and upstream has
> moved on a lot. As a package maintainer, it's hard to justify caring too
> much about bugs reported against 0.9.1, since the bug is likely to have
> very little relevance to the latest upstream.
>
> Also, it would be really nice to have a kvm-userspace based off a solid
> qemu release ... qemu moving so fast is great, but it means it's hard to
> predict the stability of a given kvm-userspace release.
>
> Some questions:
>
>   - Will there be a period before the release when only bug fixes are 
>     merged?
>   

It's a good idea, but it may be hard to pull off practically speaking 
for the first release.  Let's see how it works out.

>   - Will there be a release candidate?
>   

Sometime this week, I'll try to post something summarizing our current 
state and anything outstanding.  If there's time to put out an -rc, I'll 
try to make one available.  Things may hiccup a bit.

>   - Is there any missing features that we might push out the release
>     date for?
>   

Personally, I don't think so.  I think openbios was the biggest issue 
because we don't have the code for the current firmware.  It looks like 
that's been almost resolved.  I'm more interested in getting a release 
out in a timely manner than holding up for any particular feature.

If we have lots of features going in, I'd rather do more frequent 
releases than hold up releases.

>   - Post-release, is there any interest in maintaining a stable branch 
>     until the next release?
>   

I am tempted to try it out.  Let's see how it goes.

>   - The plan for the next release is roughly 6 months, yes?
>   

Yup.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>
>
>