From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cfnwi-0007H8-IN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:24:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cfnwh-0007fd-HW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:24:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:23:55 -0500 (EST) From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <49937814.23682538.1487597035306.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <878tp1yp4l.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> References: <1487161136-9018-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <575ab227-e44e-8d66-7b58-3e68e1df8491@redhat.com> <878tp7tx98.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <87poidkqv4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <35ce9aed-b82a-3270-a4a9-12f2e1782b9d@redhat.com> <878tp1yp4l.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] hw: Deprecate unwanted use -drive if=scsi List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com > >>>> Is that an Acked-by? > >>> > >>> Not a sufficient one because the patch touches files outside my area of > >>> maintenance, but for hw/scsi you can treat it as one. > >> > >> Okay, that covers PATCH 1/3. > >> > >> What about PATCH 3/3? It's actually your idea... > > > > Yep, hw/i386 too I guess. > > Do you mean the he/i386 part of PATCH 2/3? How would I express that? > Acked-by goes into the commit message, not individual files... I mean that you only need Peter to ack now. Paolo