From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXuxJ-0006EH-Cn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:07:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXuxH-0006DT-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:07:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58214 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXuxH-0006DO-AP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:07:31 -0500 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:19541) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXuxG-0004hi-TE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:07:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4995447B.3030505@eu.citrix.com> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:59:23 +0000 From: Stefano Stabellini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release References: <4988AD96.6090308@codemonkey.ws> <20090213084023.GA1020@kos.to> In-Reply-To: <20090213084023.GA1020@kos.to> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Riku Voipio wrote: >> .. to decide if there's anything we need to fix before a release. > > At least the OS X (cocoa) host is broken, which is IMHO pretty > bad regression. Apart from that I'm not aware of any major regression > (wearing arm-linux-user, some arm-softmmu and debian hats). > There was a patch laying around few weeks ago that was OK for most cases but didn't work in some. If we don't have anything better I think we could accept the patch and add a few #ifdef in vga.c to make sure the patch does not break.