From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYlZ6-0000pY-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:18:04 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYlZ3-0000pM-HU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:18:03 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36974 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LYlZ3-0000p9-Cl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:18:01 -0500 Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.156]:1345) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYlZ3-0005O1-4k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:18:01 -0500 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 4so1235028yxp.82 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:18:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49985C3A.5060108@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:17:30 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Cutting a new QEMU release References: <1233825194.6637.4.camel@ecrins.fosdick.home.net> <498AF6FC.90803@codemonkey.ws> <200902050936.49909.rickv@hobi.com> <200902051627.21972.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 05.02.2009 um 18:51 schrieb Ben Taylor: > >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Paul Brook >> wrote: >>> >>> In practice Fabice is pretty much the only person who's ever done >>> significant >>> work on kqemu (except maybe some fairly minor host OS porting bits). >>> There's >>> never been a public source repository, so you get to use whatever >>> random >>> tarballs Fabrice leaves lying around. If those don't work, noone really >>> cares. >> >> I've maintained tarballs for both 1.4.0 and 1.3.0 at the qemu project >> on OpenSolaris.org, and just realized that I never put into the SVN repo >> the mods I made to the 1.4.0 code. I had tested it with Solaris SXCE >> and Ubuntu 08.04. If anyone shows some interest in testing, I'll import >> the 1.4.0 into the SVN repo. I believe that I picked up the minor >> patches that were posted to the list to fix compilations on linux >> with some various kernels. > > I have happily used kqemu 1.4 on OpenSolaris for several months > without problems, running Linux in sparc-softmmu and Haiku/BeOS in > i386-softmmu. > > I did have to tweak the Makefile a little for kqemu to link on > OpenSolaris/amd64, I believe. Possibly by replacing ld with > path/to/amd64/ld. > > There has been no rumor of any KVM port to Solaris. Linux kernel > integration cannot be the only criteria. > It used to work in early December - could we set up a Git repo for > Fabrice's official tarball? Then we could apply the OpenSolaris.org > changes on a branch and play with our own Git forks to keep it working > as long as there is no alternative. Asking for maintainers of > unversioned software seems doomed to fail. Set up a repository somewhere. You don't need anyone's permission for that. Savannah isn't a great place for hosting. You can only have one git repo per project. I'd suggest something like github or repo.or.cz. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Andreas > > >