qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:19:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49985CB7.4090803@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090215154207.GA24821@shareable.org>

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:
>>     
>>> Have done, did you read the other thread?
>>>       
>> Yes, but your patch confused me (which is admittedly not hard).
>>
>>     
>>>> It's QEMU SVN delta 5005-5006, copied below.
>>>>         
>> So why such an aggressive revert?  Why not just revert the problematic
>> changesets?
>>     
>
> Because most of the following changes look too dependent on it.
>   

Too dependent on the introduced functionality or too dependent to make 
porting trivial?  My impression upon looking was that it's the later, 
not the former.  If that is the case, then someone needs to do the work 
of properly reverting.

> I did keep a couple of changes which are trivially independent since
> that one - default to "cache=writeback" and eliminating #define
> offsetof.
>
> You have a point that QEMU SVN deltas up to 5005 don't need to be
> reverted.  Reason for that: I simply don't have time to trim the patch
> down to its bare essentials quickly, and being a corruption bug, it
> should be dealt with quickly.  This one seems to work; feel free to
> improve it by reverting less, or waiting a long time for me to do so :-)
>   

But many of the changes since 5005 were also corruption fixes.  And 
let's be clear, your data is *not* safe with qcow2.  So I don't consider 
this to be a show stopping issue.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> -- Jamie
>
>
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-15 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-03 20:48 [Qemu-devel] Cutting a new QEMU release Anthony Liguori
2009-02-03 20:58 ` Glauber Costa
2009-02-03 21:35   ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-02-03 21:50     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-03 22:05       ` Laurent Desnogues
2009-02-03 22:47         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-03 23:48           ` Glauber Costa
2009-02-04 13:09       ` Ulrich Hecht
2009-02-04  0:31     ` David Turner
     [not found]     ` <74222928-D24B-4780-BDB0-D537A83C4F68@hotmail.com>
2009-02-04  5:08       ` C.W. Betts
2009-02-03 21:48 ` Rick Vernam
2009-02-03 22:07 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-02-04 14:50 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-02-04 15:23   ` Tristan Gingold
2009-02-04 15:43     ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-02-04 16:01       ` Tristan Gingold
2009-02-04 18:17         ` [Qemu-devel] " Consul
2009-02-04 17:39   ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
2009-02-04 17:50     ` Jonathan Kalbfeld
2009-02-04 20:07   ` Blue Swirl
2009-02-07 14:15   ` Stuart Brady
2009-02-04 15:58 ` Glauber Costa
2009-02-07 15:29 ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-02-11 21:49   ` Rob Landley
2009-02-12 14:44     ` Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI
2009-02-12 21:08       ` Rob Landley
2009-02-12 21:44       ` Rob Landley
2009-02-09 12:43 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-02-09 21:36   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-10  0:47   ` Rob Landley
2009-02-10  7:22     ` M. Warner Losh
2009-02-13  8:40 ` Riku Voipio
2009-02-13  9:59   ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-02-13 16:30   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-13 17:00     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-13 19:04       ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports Jamie Lokier
2009-02-14 22:23         ` Dor Laor
2009-02-15  2:20           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-14 23:13         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-15  2:01           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-15  4:09             ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-15 15:42               ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-15 18:19                 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-02-15 18:34                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16  1:01                     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-17  0:52                       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-17  2:55                         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-16  1:19                     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-02-17  1:01                   ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49985CB7.4090803@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).