From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYrsT-0002ec-P0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:02:29 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LYrsR-0002ds-SE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:02:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35592 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LYrsR-0002do-NK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:02:27 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]:60855) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LYrsR-0007rT-8y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:02:27 -0500 Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so3368953gxk.10 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:02:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4998BB06.1020306@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:01:58 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Revert block-qcow2.c to kvm-72 version due to corruption reports References: <4988AD96.6090308@codemonkey.ws> <20090213084023.GA1020@kos.to> <20090213163043.GJ18471@shareable.org> <4995A723.9010208@codemonkey.ws> <20090213190419.GB20328@shareable.org> <4997502D.1080401@codemonkey.ws> <20090215020126.GA9281@shareable.org> <20090215154207.GA24821@shareable.org> <49985CB7.4090803@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> And let's be clear, your data is *not* safe with qcow2. So I don't >> consider this to be a show stopping issue. >> > > I beg your pardon? The one format that was recommended for quite a long > time now is considered unsafe? > It's always been that way. It's unsafe for a number of reasons that have been discussed at great length. Regards, Anthony LIguori > That would not have happened with Fabrice in charge, > Dscho > >