From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ1wd-0006w3-Bb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:47:27 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ1wa-0006vS-Us for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:47:26 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42393 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ1wa-0006vP-PG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:47:24 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33440) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZ1wa-0007Kj-Ag for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:47:24 -0500 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GBlNiI026624 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:47:23 -0500 Message-ID: <49995266.3050707@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:47:50 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels References: <7fac565a0902150510y1fb01c6awd1dcc3b6e7b8232d@mail.gmail.com> <7fac565a0902150911u1ed66ef0gc55663d723c76ae4@mail.gmail.com> <4999407C.5040009@eu.citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <4999407C.5040009@eu.citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Alexey Eremenko wrote: > > >> Hello... Has anyone looked into this? >> >> > > > Does kvm have this fix "Fix SDL slowness.": > > git-svn-id: c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162 > > Yes. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.