From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZ6RX-0005xc-KZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:35:39 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZ6RV-0005x9-G7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60130 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ6RV-0005x6-Av
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:35:37 -0500
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41301)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1LZ6RU-0002K7-QJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:35:37 -0500
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1GGZaB1020028
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:35:36 -0500
Message-ID: <499995F5.903@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:36:05 +0000
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable
	levels
References: <7fac565a0902150510y1fb01c6awd1dcc3b6e7b8232d@mail.gmail.com>	<7fac565a0902150911u1ed66ef0gc55663d723c76ae4@mail.gmail.com>	<4999407C.5040009@eu.citrix.com>	<49995266.3050707@redhat.com>
	<4999913F.3040108@eu.citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <4999913F.3040108@eu.citrix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Does kvm have this fix "Fix SDL slowness.":
>>>
>>> git-svn-id: c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Yes.
>>
>>     
>
>
> Do you see the problem only on X11 remote?
>   

Only tested X11 local so far.

> How bad is on vnc?
>   

Will test.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.