From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZ7uz-00015A-5N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:10:09 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZ7ux-00012N-Hc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:10:08 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49406 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ7ux-000127-DJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:10:07 -0500
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]:55738)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <weil@mail.berlios.de>) id 1LZ7uw-0002m3-Sj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:10:07 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=stefan)
	by flocke.weilnetz.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <weil@mail.berlios.de>) id 1LZ7us-0008O8-I9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:10:02 +0100
Message-ID: <4999ABFA.80506@mail.berlios.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:10:02 +0100
From: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add QEMU_NORETURN to some functions
References: <4995E9A8.6030403@mail.berlios.de> <4999892F.6030900@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4999892F.6030900@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Anthony Liguori schrieb:
> Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this patch adds the QEMU_NORETURN attribute to several functions.
>>   
>
> Why?  Does this eliminate warnings?
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori

Yes, if you compile using compiler option -Wmissing-noreturn.

Regards
Stefan Weil