qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
	"Torbjörn Andersson" <tobbe.tt@home.se>,
	"Paul Brook" <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Machine description, an alternativ using XML
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:14:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A71452.7000103@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902261606.06841.paul@codesourcery.com>

Paul Brook wrote:
>>   <OBJECT name="pic" class="pl190">
>>     <ATTRIBUTE name="pic">	<value obj_ref=":cpu"/>  </ATTRIBUTE>
>>     <ATTRIBUTE name="memmap">	<value obj_ref=":memmap"/>  </ATTRIBUTE>
>>     <ATTRIBUTE name="base">	<value integer="0xc0010000"/>  </ATTRIBUTE>
>>   </OBJECT>
>> <MACHINE/>
>>     
>
> It looks like you're just using XML to encapsulate simple <key,value> pairs, 
> which IMHO is completely the wrong way to use XML. Qemu already has to know 
> about things like IO regions, IRQs, bus bindings. XML gives you the power to 
> describe these things properly, rather than relying on clumsy naming 
> conventions.
>   

I'm really don't want to see this get furthered rat holed.  Since we all 
seemed relatively happy with the device tree as a configuration file, 
can we agree to that firmly and avoid this discussion?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-26 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-26  6:49 [Qemu-devel] Machine description, an alternativ using XML Torbjörn Andersson
2009-02-26 16:06 ` Paul Brook
2009-02-26 20:26   ` SV: " Torbjörn Andersson
2009-02-26 22:14   ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-26  9:36 Jamie Lokier
2009-02-26 12:01 ` Torbjörn Andersson
2009-02-26 13:24   ` Steve Fosdick
2009-02-26 18:48     ` Andreas Färber
2009-02-26 21:47       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-26 19:41 ` Blue Swirl
2009-02-26 13:09 Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A71452.7000103@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=tobbe.tt@home.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).