From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ld7ra-0000Fs-40
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:55:10 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ld7rY-0000F5-K3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:55:09 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39598 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld7rY-0000F2-HK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:55:08 -0500
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.148]:15446)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Ld7rY-0005K7-60
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:55:08 -0500
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1093513qwk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A83707.9030309@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:55:03 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] How are we looking for a release?
References: <49A824ED.9070806@codemonkey.ws>
	<ABB0ACCA-C1FA-4796-8B9A-2C72D6F818D6@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <ABB0ACCA-C1FA-4796-8B9A-2C72D6F818D6@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Am 27.02.2009 um 18:37 schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>
>> I wanted to see how we look from a release perspective. [...] I think 
>> we'll be ready in a few days.
>
>> Are there any major bug fixes people are working on?
>
> Cocoa is still broken. There was a draft patch from Stefano on Dec 19 
> and another one from Samuel Benson on Jan 25. I'll try to look into it 
> the weekend.

My understanding is they still didn't fix it entirely.  The current 
cocoa implementation is extremely difficult to maintain.  I'd really 
like to see it deprecated in favor of SDL (knowing that SDL doesn't work 
on 64-bit OS X--but does that even exist today?).

> I believe the last remaining issues were for 16-bit; if it works 
> otherwise, I would ask you to consider applying it in order to have a 
> compiling release. We could fix any display issues in a separate patch 
> if necessary.

I'm okay with that too.  Just have the appropriate person resubmit.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Regards,
>
> Andreas