From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ld8XL-0002ZH-MO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:38:19 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ld8XJ-0002Vb-DE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:38:18 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41388 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld8XJ-0002VI-1J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:38:17 -0500
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.145]:28680)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Ld8XI-0003LX-Q5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:38:16 -0500
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1111615qwk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:38:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A84124.1000003@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:38:12 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] How are we looking for a release?
References: <49A824ED.9070806@codemonkey.ws>	<ABB0ACCA-C1FA-4796-8B9A-2C72D6F818D6@web.de>	<49A83707.9030309@codemonkey.ws>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0902272218440.4728@linmac.oyster.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902272218440.4728@linmac.oyster.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>

malc wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>   
>> Andreas F?rber wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Anthony,
>>>
>>> Am 27.02.2009 um 18:37 schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> I wanted to see how we look from a release perspective. [...] I think
>>>> we'll be ready in a few days.
>>>>         
>>>> Are there any major bug fixes people are working on?
>>>>         
>>> Cocoa is still broken. There was a draft patch from Stefano on Dec 19 and
>>> another one from Samuel Benson on Jan 25. I'll try to look into it the
>>> weekend.
>>>       
>> My understanding is they still didn't fix it entirely.  The current cocoa
>> implementation is extremely difficult to maintain.  I'd really like to see it
>> deprecated in favor of SDL (knowing that SDL doesn't work on 64-bit OS X--but
>> does that even exist today?).
>>     
>
> As i mentioned before SDL is next to unusable under OSX.
>   

That's a recent regression though?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori