From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld8lo-0007WK-P9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:53:16 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld8ln-0007U6-5p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:53:16 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40308 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld8ln-0007U3-2l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:53:15 -0500 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.148]:24723) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ld8lm-0005aH-Sb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:53:14 -0500 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1117522qwk.4 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:53:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49A844A5.2060006@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:53:09 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 00/19] monitor rework References: <20090221182915.1962.31375.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> <49A82636.60709@us.ibm.com> <49A82980.6000302@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <49A82980.6000302@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jan Kiszka wrote: > Just keep in mind that we then start with a few regressions around > encrypted disks (leaving them mostly unusable). Or do you plan to merge > the bug-fixing part into the stable tree later on? > Good question. Is it possible to separate the bug fixing parts from more of the general refactoring? Regards, Anthony Liguori > Jan > >