From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld9ud-00044u-5t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:06:27 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld9uc-00044b-Kn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:06:26 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60934 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ld9uc-00044Y-Hu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:06:26 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:57732) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ld9uc-00007k-24 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:06:26 -0500 Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53268F8B10BF for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:06:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [88.65.40.199] (helo=[192.168.1.198]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1Ld9ua-0004y6-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:06:24 +0100 Message-ID: <49A855CC.10002@web.de> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:06:20 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090221182915.1962.31375.stgit@mchn012c.ww002.siemens.net> <49A82636.60709@us.ibm.com> <49A82980.6000302@siemens.com> <49A844A5.2060006@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <49A844A5.2060006@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0F484631670F11DB08669657" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 00/19] monitor rework Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0F484631670F11DB08669657 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anthony Liguori wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Just keep in mind that we then start with a few regressions around >> encrypted disks (leaving them mostly unusable). Or do you plan to merg= e >> the bug-fixing part into the stable tree later on? >> =20 >=20 > Good question. Is it possible to separate the bug fixing parts from > more of the general refactoring? As I said: find bug fixes or small polishing in patches 1..8. They should be considered for a stable version. Jan --------------enig0F484631670F11DB08669657 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmoVcwACgkQniDOoMHTA+n/OwCeMYpISyd1r6ZjmtZx/A8c+soI hgsAnA+ZuJKIpoRcr2FwL3fLH2j3ke2H =gGY6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0F484631670F11DB08669657--