From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeWbG-0001tW-Iy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:32:06 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeWbF-0001rb-BR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:32:06 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40546 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LeWbF-0001rK-5w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:32:05 -0500 Received: from vsmtp02.dti.ne.jp ([202.216.231.137]:46613) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LeWbE-0000WD-Ay for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:32:05 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.22] (PPPa1209.e11.eacc.dti.ne.jp [124.255.90.198]) by vsmtp02.dti.ne.jp (3.11v) with ESMTP AUTH id n23FVxbS022640 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 00:32:00 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <49AD4D70.3010705@juno.dti.ne.jp> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:32:00 +0900 From: Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sh : performance problem References: <49A6C317.1080202@juno.dti.ne.jp> <1235848518.7364.2.camel@coalu.atr> <49AA25BF.3070707@juno.dti.ne.jp> <1236033035.4975.1.camel@coalu.atr> In-Reply-To: <1236033035.4975.1.camel@coalu.atr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > Le dimanche 01 mars 2009 =C3=A0 15:05 +0900, Shin-ichiro KAWASAKI a =C3= =A9crit : >> Hi, Lionel. >> Thank you for the response! >> >> Lionel Landwerlin wrote: >>> Le vendredi 27 f=C3=A9vrier 2009 =C3=A0 01:28 +0900, Shin-ichiro KAWA= SAKI a >>> =C3=A9crit : >>> >>> Hi Shin-ichiro, >>> >>> I'm interested by your patch, but it does not apply on top of the r62= 15 >>> (qemu svn) + qemu-sh patches >>> ( http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dvirt/qemu/lethal/qemu-sh.git;a=3Dsummary= )=20 >>> >>> Should I try on the last qemu svn ? >> Yes. When I send patch to qemu-devel ml, I make diff against >> qemu main repository. Could you try on it? >> >> >=20 > Are you working on a 32 or 64bits host system ? >=20 > I experiencing a lot of random behavior with qemu... My host system is 32 bit. Core 2 Duo and VMware. I often see sometimes user process fails with segmentation fault. I know nothing about sh4 system emulation on 64 bit host. > >From now I don't a have video anymore...