From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LfhDS-0003dv-1I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:04:22 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LfhDQ-0003d9-BT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:04:21 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56844 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LfhDQ-0003d1-0B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:04:20 -0500
Received: from smtp130.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.53.35]:31566)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dschaefer@rogers.com>) id 1LfhDP-0004qo-BR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:04:19 -0500
Message-ID: <49B18FD2.8080505@rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:04:18 -0500
From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@rogers.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.10.0 crash on Win32
References: <667761.80488.qm@web30601.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<49B1807F.8030808@bttr-software.de>	<49B18A77.1080104@rogers.com>
	<49B18E5E.8000708@bttr-software.de>
In-Reply-To: <49B18E5E.8000708@bttr-software.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Robert Riebisch wrote:
> Doug Schaefer wrote:
>
>   
>> Were you using the 1.3 or the 1.4 kqemu?
>>     
>
> Quoting myself: "KQEMU version: 1.4.0pre1"
>
> Recent QEMU 0.9.1 SVN or 0.10.0 won't work with KQEMU 1.3. It will
> display "Version mismatch between kqemu module and qemu" instead.
>
> Robert Riebisch
>   

Oops. Sorry. I didn't look back far enough :).

I'll give it try myself and see if I can reproduce. I'm using tdragon as 
well. I haven't had an issue with arm, but I haven't tried x86 either.

Doug.