From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgKpR-0002Hf-LD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:22:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgKpO-0002G3-Vr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:22:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52543 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgKpO-0002Fx-RV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:22:10 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.247]:9535) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgKpO-0001z7-J0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:22:10 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so592554ana.37 for ; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:22:07 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel Avi Kivity wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to announce the creation of a QEMU stable branch based on >> the recent 0.10.0 release. You can access it via anonymous SVN via: >> >> svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 >> >> The stable branch will receive bug fixes from trunk until at least >> the next major release. If submitting a bug fix, please consider >> also testing the patch against stable and sending multiple patches if >> appropriate. Using a tag in the subject line like [STABLE] would >> also be helpful to indicate to the maintainers that a patch should be >> considered for the stable tree. >> >> As the stable tree accumulates fixes, we'll make new stable releases >> from the tree. >> > > Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the > latter) I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion. Regards, Anthony Liguori