From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgLcT-00057q-2g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:12:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgLcR-00056M-FJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:12:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40043 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgLcR-000568-4o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:12:51 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.240]:2007) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgLcQ-0000Xd-R2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:12:50 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so597680ana.37 for ; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:12:47 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> <49B3E4E8.9080700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <49B3E4E8.9080700@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel Avi Kivity wrote: > > In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no? That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable naming convention. I was hoping to have the first stable release about 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW. There's already some good stuff in the stable tree. Regards, Anthony Liguori