From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LgNSl-0000Rn-1f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:59 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LgNSk-0000Ra-1H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:58 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55590 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgNSj-0000RX-U6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:57 -0400
Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.154]:28264)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1LgNSj-0003or-LB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:57 -0400
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so538558ywa.82
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49B40A2E.1060909@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:10:54 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws>
	<49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com>	<49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws>
	<49B3E4E8.9080700@redhat.com>	<49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws>
	<32BE0974-5BDA-465E-A588-6E812E008A83@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <32BE0974-5BDA-465E-A588-6E812E008A83@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Andreas Färber wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> Am 08.03.2009 um 17:12 schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>
>> I was hoping to have the first stable release about 2 weeks after the 
>> 0.10.0 release FWIW.  There's already some good stuff in the stable 
>> tree.
>
> Could you please consider the configure patches for that release. They 
> were intended to make it into 0.10.0 but are mostly still unreviewed.

Sure, but one of the patches was an [RFC] so another version is needed 
before it could be considered for review.

The other patch got some valid comments against it that still haven't 
been resolved.  If you post newer versions, they can be considered for 
stable.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Open issues in 0.10.0 include:
> * undocumented command line switches
> * $OS_CFLAGS ignored for some compile tests
> * $CFLAGS ignored for compile tests
> * L14N issues when grep'ing tool output
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andreas
>
>
>