From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lgloh-0001Z3-5r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:11:15 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lglog-0001Xk-Br
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:11:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57338 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lglof-0001XF-Q1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:11:13 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:2705)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1Lglob-0007Gl-IT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:11:09 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1Lgc3R-0002Rf-UI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 05:45:50 -0400
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n299gnQc026297
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 05:42:49 -0400
Message-ID: <49B4E498.6010709@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:42:48 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [6684] Fix "info registers" under kvm.
References: <E1LeyCK-0007nk-NI@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<49B3EAA8.6050900@web.de>	<49B3EE01.3090402@codemonkey.ws>
	<27E8D756-2550-4804-BE0D-54002A41E8A6@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <27E8D756-2550-4804-BE0D-54002A41E8A6@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
>
> Am 08.03.2009 um 17:10 schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> I'm just still waiting for a reply from Anthony on how to embed best=20
>>> all
>>> the "if (kvm_enabled()) foo();" patterns [2]. [...]
>>
>> I really don't have a great suggestion.  I've been hoping we could=20
>> come up with something better than if (kvm_enabled()) foo().  If we=20
>> can't, we can't.
>
> What about this pattern:
>
> #define KVM(x) if (kvm_enabled()) { x; }
> KVM(foo());
>
> That would make it shorter to type and allows to #define KVM(x) for=20
> the no-KVM case.
>

Need to work out what to do if the function returns a value.

--=20
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function