From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lglnh-00008n-2f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:10:13 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lglnf-00005X-7x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:10:11 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36231 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lglnf-00005J-59
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:10:11 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:2685)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1Lglne-0007EG-8z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:10:10 -0400
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1Lgepn-0001XL-5r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:43:55 -0400
Message-ID: <49B50DDA.3010007@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:38:50 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com>
	<49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws>
	<200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

Paul Brook wrote:
>>>>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
>>>>         
>>> Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the
>>> latter)
>>>       
>> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.
>>     
>
> Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be 
> stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases).
>   

This is my preference as well.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function