From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LglnK-0007yn-6f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:09:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LglnH-0007uW-4A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:09:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36185 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LglnG-0007uF-RV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:09:46 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:2667) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LglnG-00079j-Ij for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:09:46 -0400 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.153]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lgfjz-00046l-Re for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:41:59 -0400 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so645788ywa.82 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49B51C55.6000803@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:40:37 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel , Avi Kivity Paul Brook wrote: >>>> svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 >>>> >>> Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the >>> latter) >>> >> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion. >> > > Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be > stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases). > FWIW, I renamed the branch to stable_0_10. Regards, Anthony Liguroi > Paul >