From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lh2sa-00011Y-To
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:24 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lh2sZ-0000zb-4U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:24 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43271 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lh2sY-0000zQ-Tl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:22 -0400
Received: from smtp113.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.225.229]:44846)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dschaefer@rogers.com>) id 1Lh2sY-00070h-KV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:22 -0400
Message-ID: <49B67813.2000802@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:19 -0400
From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@rogers.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws>
	<49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com>	<49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws>
	<49B3E4E8.9080700@redhat.com>	<49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws>
	<7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BA4@clara.maurer-it.com>
In-Reply-To: <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BA4@clara.maurer-it.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> I just wonder if 0.XX is a good name for a stable release. May is suggest to increase the major number (1.XX). 
>
>
>   

It's not that stable....

Doug.