From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LhTIn-00060K-L0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:37:13 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LhTIk-000602-PC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:37:12 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35595 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LhTIk-0005zz-Hp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:37:10 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.245]:17186)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1LhTIk-0003cI-6V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:37:10 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so117645rvb.22
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49B804D0.50304@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:37:04 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Compiling qemu with nas installed
References: <200903111854.50355.hasso@estpak.ee>
In-Reply-To: <200903111854.50355.hasso@estpak.ee>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hasso Tepper wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> You should use --extra-cflags and --extra-ldflags.  If we're not already
>> making these come before our -I$(srcdir), then we should change that.
>>     
>
> Well, I may do whatever, but CPPFLAGS (yes this is correct, not CFLAGS) 
> and LDFLAGS is a common way also used by pkgsrc package management system 
> (therefore out of control of user at all).
>  
>   
>> Basically, we need to ensure that any of our headers have include
>> priority over system headers in the search path.
>>     
>
> Yes, but to do it regardless what user might specify via CPPFLAGS.
>   

Right now, setting CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS is not what's supported by QEMU 
so if you do that (instead of using --extra-cflags --extra-ldflags), YMMV.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori