From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] x86: Enhanced dump of segment registers
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:40:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B813C7.4010608@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B7C31F.5030201@siemens.com>
Parse the descriptor flags that segment registers refer to and show the
result in a more human-friendly format. The output of info registers eg.
then looks like this:
[...]
ES =007b 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 DPL=3 DS [-WA]
CS =0060 00000000 ffffffff 00c09b00 DPL=0 CS32 [-RA]
SS =0068 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
DS =007b 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 DPL=3 DS [-WA]
FS =0000 00000000 00000000 00000000
GS =0033 b7dd66c0 ffffffff b7dff3dd DPL=3 DS [-WA]
LDT=0000 00000000 00000000 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
TR =0080 c06da700 0000206b 00008900 DPL=0 TSS32-avl
[...]
Changes in this version:
- refactoring so that only a single helper is used for dumping the
segment descriptor cache
- tiny typo fixed that broke 64-bit segment type names
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
---
target-i386/cpu.h | 3 +-
target-i386/helper.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h
index 90bceab..f38f194 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.h
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.h
@@ -82,9 +82,10 @@
#define DESC_AVL_MASK (1 << 20)
#define DESC_P_MASK (1 << 15)
#define DESC_DPL_SHIFT 13
-#define DESC_DPL_MASK (1 << DESC_DPL_SHIFT)
+#define DESC_DPL_MASK (3 << DESC_DPL_SHIFT)
#define DESC_S_MASK (1 << 12)
#define DESC_TYPE_SHIFT 8
+#define DESC_TYPE_MASK (15 << DESC_TYPE_SHIFT)
#define DESC_A_MASK (1 << 8)
#define DESC_CS_MASK (1 << 11) /* 1=code segment 0=data segment */
diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c
index 8213703..5ce8798 100644
--- a/target-i386/helper.c
+++ b/target-i386/helper.c
@@ -570,6 +570,61 @@ static const char *cc_op_str[] = {
"SARQ",
};
+static void
+cpu_x86_dump_seg_cache(CPUState *env, FILE *f,
+ int (*cpu_fprintf)(FILE *f, const char *fmt, ...),
+ const char *name, struct SegmentCache *sc)
+{
+#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
+ if (env->hflags & HF_CS64_MASK) {
+ cpu_fprintf(f, "%-3s=%04x %016" PRIx64 " %08x %08x", name,
+ sc->selector, sc->base, sc->limit, sc->flags);
+ } else
+#endif
+ {
+ cpu_fprintf(f, "%-3s=%04x %08x %08x %08x", name, sc->selector,
+ (uint32_t)sc->base, sc->limit, sc->flags);
+ }
+
+ if (!(env->hflags & HF_PE_MASK) || !(sc->flags & DESC_P_MASK))
+ goto done;
+
+ cpu_fprintf(f, " DPL=%d ", (sc->flags & DESC_DPL_MASK) >> DESC_DPL_SHIFT);
+ if (sc->flags & DESC_S_MASK) {
+ if (sc->flags & DESC_CS_MASK) {
+ cpu_fprintf(f, (sc->flags & DESC_L_MASK) ? "CS64" :
+ ((sc->flags & DESC_B_MASK) ? "CS32" : "CS16"));
+ cpu_fprintf(f, " [%c%c", (sc->flags & DESC_C_MASK) ? 'C' : '-',
+ (sc->flags & DESC_R_MASK) ? 'R' : '-');
+ } else {
+ cpu_fprintf(f, (sc->flags & DESC_B_MASK) ? "DS " : "DS16");
+ cpu_fprintf(f, " [%c%c", (sc->flags & DESC_E_MASK) ? 'E' : '-',
+ (sc->flags & DESC_W_MASK) ? 'W' : '-');
+ }
+ cpu_fprintf(f, "%c]", (sc->flags & DESC_A_MASK) ? 'A' : '-');
+ } else {
+ static const char *sys_type_name[2][16] = {
+ { /* 32 bit mode */
+ "Reserved", "TSS16-avl", "LDT", "TSS16-busy",
+ "CallGate16", "TaskGate", "IntGate16", "TrapGate16",
+ "Reserved", "TSS32-avl", "Reserved", "TSS32-busy",
+ "CallGate32", "Reserved", "IntGate32", "TrapGate32"
+ },
+ { /* 64 bit mode */
+ "<hiword>", "Reserved", "LDT", "Reserved", "Reserved",
+ "Reserved", "Reserved", "Reserved", "Reserved",
+ "TSS64-avl", "Reserved", "TSS64-busy", "CallGate64",
+ "Reserved", "IntGate64", "TrapGate64"
+ }
+ };
+ cpu_fprintf(f, sys_type_name[(env->hflags & HF_LMA_MASK) ? 1 : 0]
+ [(sc->flags & DESC_TYPE_MASK)
+ >> DESC_TYPE_SHIFT]);
+ }
+done:
+ cpu_fprintf(f, "\n");
+}
+
void cpu_dump_state(CPUState *env, FILE *f,
int (*cpu_fprintf)(FILE *f, const char *fmt, ...),
int flags)
@@ -648,27 +703,15 @@ void cpu_dump_state(CPUState *env, FILE *f,
env->halted);
}
+ for(i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
+ cpu_x86_dump_seg_cache(env, f, cpu_fprintf, seg_name[i],
+ &env->segs[i]);
+ }
+ cpu_x86_dump_seg_cache(env, f, cpu_fprintf, "LDT", &env->ldt);
+ cpu_x86_dump_seg_cache(env, f, cpu_fprintf, "TR", &env->tr);
+
#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
if (env->hflags & HF_LMA_MASK) {
- for(i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
- SegmentCache *sc = &env->segs[i];
- cpu_fprintf(f, "%s =%04x %016" PRIx64 " %08x %08x\n",
- seg_name[i],
- sc->selector,
- sc->base,
- sc->limit,
- sc->flags);
- }
- cpu_fprintf(f, "LDT=%04x %016" PRIx64 " %08x %08x\n",
- env->ldt.selector,
- env->ldt.base,
- env->ldt.limit,
- env->ldt.flags);
- cpu_fprintf(f, "TR =%04x %016" PRIx64 " %08x %08x\n",
- env->tr.selector,
- env->tr.base,
- env->tr.limit,
- env->tr.flags);
cpu_fprintf(f, "GDT= %016" PRIx64 " %08x\n",
env->gdt.base, env->gdt.limit);
cpu_fprintf(f, "IDT= %016" PRIx64 " %08x\n",
@@ -685,25 +728,6 @@ void cpu_dump_state(CPUState *env, FILE *f,
} else
#endif
{
- for(i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
- SegmentCache *sc = &env->segs[i];
- cpu_fprintf(f, "%s =%04x %08x %08x %08x\n",
- seg_name[i],
- sc->selector,
- (uint32_t)sc->base,
- sc->limit,
- sc->flags);
- }
- cpu_fprintf(f, "LDT=%04x %08x %08x %08x\n",
- env->ldt.selector,
- (uint32_t)env->ldt.base,
- env->ldt.limit,
- env->ldt.flags);
- cpu_fprintf(f, "TR =%04x %08x %08x %08x\n",
- env->tr.selector,
- (uint32_t)env->tr.base,
- env->tr.limit,
- env->tr.flags);
cpu_fprintf(f, "GDT= %08x %08x\n",
(uint32_t)env->gdt.base, env->gdt.limit);
cpu_fprintf(f, "IDT= %08x %08x\n",
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-11 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-11 13:56 [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH] x86: Enhanced dump of segment registers Jan Kiszka
2009-03-11 16:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-11 16:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2009-03-11 16:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-11 19:18 ` malc
2009-03-11 19:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-03-12 14:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-12 14:57 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-03-12 17:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-12 18:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-03-11 19:40 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49B813C7.4010608@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).