From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LkboY-0008S8-W4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:18:59 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LkboU-0008Rv-EC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:18:58 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38301 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LkboU-0008Rs-8X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:18:54 -0400
Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:54285)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>)
	id 1LkboU-0000vU-0d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:18:54 -0400
Received: from [10.80.225.184] ([10.80.225.184])
	by smtp01.ad.xensource.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2KAInsF004210
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:18:50 -0700
Message-ID: <49C36CA0.9010707@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:14:56 +0000
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] vnc: throttle screen updates.
References: <49C11CAC.3060405@redhat.com> <49C28020.5060503@eu.citrix.com>
	<49C355DA.8070504@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <49C355DA.8070504@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:

> Point being?
> Note that we can satisfy multiple update requests in one reply.
> Also note that vnc_copy() sets force_update too.

right, not so useful then. I drop the suggestion.