From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: Release 0.10.1 of QEMU
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:20:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C94E8E.30202@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903241607.34007.rob@landley.net>
Rob Landley wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 18:25:23 Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> The QEMU team is pleased to announce the availability of the 0.10.1
>> release. This is a stable release of the 0.10 tree and contains only
>> bug fixes since the 0.10.0. The attached Changelog includes all of the
>> changes that have went in since 0.10.0.
>>
>> It can be downloaded from Savannah at:
>>
>> http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/qemu/qemu-0.10.1.tar.gz
>>
>
> This doesn't include a fix powerpc -nographic (either by reverting to the
> previous openbios-ppc or by upgrading to current OpenBios svn):
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-03/msg01070.html
>
> Nor does it include the fix for sh4 -append:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-02/msg00727.html
>
Part of my criteria for committing to stable is pretty heavy testing of
the actual patch. For areas I don't maintain, I'm not really setup to
do the level of testing that would be required for stable.
I'd suggest that the original maintainers who commit the patches to
trunk should be the ones to determine whether a patch should also go in
stable.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Rob
>
> P.S. Sorry I didn't get to respond to your friday message. My laptop's
> Ubuntu 8.10 decided to eat itself over the weekend (I hate selinux) and I
> just finished reinstalling last night...
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-24 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-21 23:25 [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: Release 0.10.1 of QEMU Anthony Liguori
2009-03-24 21:07 ` Rob Landley
2009-03-24 21:20 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-03-31 0:25 ` Rob Landley
2009-03-31 5:55 ` Aurelien Jarno
2009-03-29 11:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-03-31 16:34 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-03-31 16:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-31 16:50 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C94E8E.30202@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).