From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LncN8-0003g0-HQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:31:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LncN3-0003dy-BL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:31:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48619 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LncN2-0003dq-SS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:31:01 -0400 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:45344) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LncN1-0006Kb-Ng for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:31:00 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e9.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2SHLUlo005294 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:21:30 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n2SHUqJk199092 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:30:52 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n2SHUqN2025094 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:30:52 -0400 Message-ID: <49CE5ECB.1040905@us.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:30:51 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] new scsi-generic abstraction, use SG_IO References: <20090318133633.GA24254@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20090318133633.GA24254@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paul Brook , Avi Kivity Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Okay, I started looking into how to handle scsi-generic I/O in the > new world order. > > I think the best is to use the SG_IO ioctl instead of the read/write > interface as that allows us to support scsi passthrough on disk/cdrom > devices, too. See Hannes patch on the kvm list from August for an > example. > > Now that we always do ioctls we don't need another abstraction than > bdrv_ioctl for the synchronous requests for now, and for asynchronous > requests I've added a aio_ioctl abstraction keeping it simple. > > Long-term we might want to move the ops to a higher-level abstraction > and let the low-level code fill out the request header, but I'm lazy > enough to leave that to the people trying to support scsi-passthrough > on a non-Linux OS. > > Tested lightly by issuing various sg_ commands from sg3-utils in a guest > to a host CDROM device. > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Applied. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori