From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LncOV-00047l-2s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:32:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LncOQ-00046K-Ep for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:32:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48657 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LncOQ-00046H-6e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:32:26 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:50565) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LncOP-0006Vb-Ux for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:32:26 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2SHTR34019099 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:29:27 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n2SHW9wW139494 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:32:09 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n2SHW9EL008534 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:32:09 -0400 Received: from squirrel.codemonkey.ws (sig-9-65-67-103.mts.ibm.com [9.65.67.103]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n2SHW8GA008524 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:32:09 -0400 Message-ID: <49CE5F18.9010805@us.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:32:08 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH] Remove nodisk_ok machine feature References: <49B7E23B.1030707@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <49B7E23B.1030707@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jan Kiszka wrote: > All archs have some kind of firmware to load and can be fine with it > already. So there is not much use in enforcing the presence of a disk. > If the system setup requires one, the user will notice it anyway once > the firmware/bios fails to boot from it. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka > Applied. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori