From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpWi2-0002Sm-6R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:52:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpWhv-0002P5-DY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:52:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53860 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LpWhv-0002P1-4J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:52:27 -0400 Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.156]:17513) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LpWhu-0000Nj-Nk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:52:26 -0400 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so506288yxf.82 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49D54FB4.9000606@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:52:20 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 04/10] qemu: introduce main_loop_break References: <20090325224714.853788328@amt.cnet> <20090325225438.990466524@amt.cnet> <20090326122717.GB20866@shareable.org> <20090402233621.GA4599@amt.cnet> In-Reply-To: <20090402233621.GA4599@amt.cnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > I didnt know. Anthony wrote this code, so I'll let him comment. > Is this guaranteed by Posix and reliable across Unixes? In general, I think it's better to be conservative with this sort of thing. Regards, Anthony Liguori