qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Introduce module API to QEMU
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:57:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D607A3.7040907@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904031235.33157.paul@codesourcery.com>

Paul Brook wrote:
>> This patch introduces a module API similar to what's in the Linux kernel. 
>> This includes module_init/module_exit functions that register functions
>> that are run at init and exit respectively.
>>     
>
> Wouldn't it be much simpler to just have a list of device names, and assume 
> the each device is implemented in $devicename., and provides 
> $devicename_register ?
>
> It's then an extremely simple shell script to collate and call these.
>   

It doesn't generalize very well.  For instance, the VNC server is not a 
device but it needs to be able to register as a DisplayState backend.

The other way to do this typically is to have module_init() functions 
that turn a function into a non-static function with some sort of 
annotation that disappears at compile time.  For instance:

module_init(virtnet_init);

Would become:

int qemu__module__init__virtnet_init(void)
{
     return virtnet_init();
}

with #define qemu__init__function

You then have something that searches for these functions.  The problem 
with this approach is that virtnet_init must be a unique name because 
it's a non-static.  You can add some uniqueness by playing with __LINE__ 
but that doesn't make any guarantees.

This is doable but IMHO a worse solution.  I'd rather use 
__attribute__((constructor)) for now and introduce the above only if we 
ever support something other than GCC.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
> Paul
>
>
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-03 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-03  2:12 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Introduce module API to QEMU Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03  2:29 ` malc
2009-04-03  3:36   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03  3:48     ` malc
2009-04-03 12:59       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:00         ` malc
2009-04-03 17:31           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:46             ` malc
2009-04-03 17:59               ` M. Warner Losh
2009-04-03 17:58             ` M. Warner Losh
2009-04-03 18:05               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 20:12               ` Kevin Wolf
2009-04-03 18:30                 ` malc
2009-04-03  7:08 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-04-03 13:01   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:36   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03  7:50 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 11:35 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 12:57   ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-04-03 13:09     ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 14:10       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 14:11       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 14:28         ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 14:53         ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 16:15           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:12     ` Blue Swirl
2009-04-03 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-03 14:54   ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 15:10     ` Paul Brook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49D607A3.7040907@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).