From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Introduce module API to QEMU
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:59:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D60814.9020703@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904030741020.2308@linmac.oyster.ru>
malc wrote:
> 4.1.2 comes from C90
>
C99 would be a more reasonable thing to quote from since it updates C89.
>> So this is exactly the sort of thing that the standard is there to
>> protect :-)
>>
>
> No. Those are reserved for _any_ use. For example, 6.2.5 states:
>
> 31) An implementation may define new keywords that provide
> alternative ways to designate a basic (or any other)
> type; this does not violate the requirement that all
> basic types be different. Implementation-defined
> keywords shall have the form of an identifier reserved
> for any use as described in 7.1.3.
>
I still think you're missing the fact that this is a variable that's
provided by the compiler. It's a GCC extension in the same way
__attribute__ is. The reason we have to declare the variables is
because it's actually provided by the linker so GCC the front-end has no
knowledge of these variables existence.
This isn't standard C99 but it certainly doesn't violate C99 either.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-03 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-03 2:12 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Introduce module API to QEMU Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 2:29 ` malc
2009-04-03 3:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 3:48 ` malc
2009-04-03 12:59 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-04-03 17:00 ` malc
2009-04-03 17:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:46 ` malc
2009-04-03 17:59 ` M. Warner Losh
2009-04-03 17:58 ` M. Warner Losh
2009-04-03 18:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 20:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-04-03 18:30 ` malc
2009-04-03 7:08 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-04-03 13:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 7:50 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 11:35 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 12:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 13:09 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 14:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 14:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 14:28 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 14:53 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 16:15 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:12 ` Blue Swirl
2009-04-03 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-03 14:54 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 15:10 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D60814.9020703@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).