From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Introduce module API to QEMU
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:15:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D63638.9090509@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D622F2.705@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm, this raises annother issue - we've got to be extremely careful
>>> about ordering. It's not inconcievable that the PCI support code
>>> would have constructors (e.g. to register a PCI bus type).
>>>
>>
>> Looks like constructor/destructor has explicit support for ordering.
>> Neat.
>
> I'd avoid it. Have the constructor do a *pci_module_table++ = blah
> and iterate through that later.
Yup, came to that conclusion too.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> I prefer to have the code explicit somewhere rather than gobs of
> unportable magic. Use it where you have to, but not elsewhere.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-03 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-03 2:12 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Introduce module API to QEMU Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 2:29 ` malc
2009-04-03 3:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 3:48 ` malc
2009-04-03 12:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:00 ` malc
2009-04-03 17:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:46 ` malc
2009-04-03 17:59 ` M. Warner Losh
2009-04-03 17:58 ` M. Warner Losh
2009-04-03 18:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 20:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-04-03 18:30 ` malc
2009-04-03 7:08 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-04-03 13:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 17:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 7:50 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 11:35 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 12:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 13:09 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 14:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 14:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-03 14:28 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-03 14:53 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 16:15 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-04-03 17:12 ` Blue Swirl
2009-04-03 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-04-03 14:54 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-03 15:10 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D63638.9090509@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).