From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LqSjc-0004Eo-DB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:50:04 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LqSjW-0004E0-W8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:50:03 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35745 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LqSjW-0004Dx-OO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:49:58 -0400
Received: from mail-gx0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176]:44272)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1LqSjW-0004p0-D6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:49:58 -0400
Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so3804888gxk.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <49D8B702.5040807@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:49:54 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/10] xen: add block device backend driver.
References: <1238621982-18333-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>	<1238621982-18333-6-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<20090402170209.GA10089@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090402170209.GA10089@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>
> We already have bdrv_aio_readv/writev which currently linearize the
> buffer underneath.  Hopefully Anthony will have commited the patch to
> implement the real one while I'm writing this, too :)
>   

Unless I missed it somehow, I'm still expecting another post from you to 
fix the use-after-free and Win32 issues I raised on the 3/29 posting.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori