qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce monitor 'wait' command
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:03:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DCBCBE.6010102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090408143335.GS18076@redhat.com>

On 04/08/09 16:33, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:16:43AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> The wait command will pause the monitor the command was issued in until a new
>> event becomes available.  Events are queued if there isn't a waiter present.
>> The wait command completes after a single event is available.
>>
>> Today, we queue events indefinitely but in the future, I suspect we'll drop
>> events that are older than a certain amount of time to avoid infinitely
>> allocating memory for long running VMs.
>>
>> To make use of the new notification mechanism, this patch introduces a
>> qemu_notify_event() API.  This API takes three parameters: a class which is
>> meant to classify the type of event being generated, a name which is meant to
>> distinguish which event in the class that has been generated, and a details
>> parameters which is meant to allow events to send arbitrary data with a given
>> event.
>
> Perhaps we should have the ability to turn on/off events, via a 'notify EVENT'
> command, and a way turn off the prompt on the channel used for receiving
> events.

That would nicely solve the "queue events indefinitely" issue.  By 
default no events are generated.  Apps which want receive them (and thus 
receive them) can enable them as needed.

> And then in the 2nd monitor channel, a single 'wait' command would turn
> off the monitor prompt and make the channel dedicated for just events,
> one per line
>
>    (qemu) wait
>    rtc-change UTC+0100
>    vnc-client connect 192.46.12.4:9353
>    vnc-client disconnect 192.46.12.4:9353
>    vnc-client connect 192.46.12.2:9353
>    vnc-client disconnect 192.46.12.2:9353

IMHO this is more useful than having "wait" just get one event.  You'll 
need a dedicated monitor channel for events anyway, so with 
one-event-per-wait the management app would have to issue wait in a loop.

BTW: "wait" is quite generic.  Maybe we should name the commands 
notify-*, i.e. have

   notify-enable $class
   notify-disable $class
   notify-getevents

cheers,
   Gerd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-08 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-08 14:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Allow multiple monitor devices Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 14:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Introduce monitor 'wait' command Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 14:33   ` [Qemu-devel] " Daniel P. Berrange
2009-04-08 14:39     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 15:03     ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2009-04-08 15:25       ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] " Jan Kiszka
2009-04-08 17:44       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 19:06         ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-08 19:35           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 20:28             ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-04-08 21:14               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 21:31                 ` Hollis Blanchard
2009-04-09 13:59                   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 21:39                 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-09  8:24                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-09 13:56                   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 17:12                     ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-08 21:27             ` Zachary Amsden
2009-04-09  9:55           ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-04-09 17:13             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-09  9:44         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-09 13:31           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 14:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Implement vm-state notifications Anthony Liguori
2009-04-08 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Allow multiple monitor devices Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DCBCBE.6010102@redhat.com \
    --to=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).