From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] buffer alignment for block backends
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:53:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DCF2C0.9070704@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49DCA80A.1020808@eu.citrix.com>
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am having an issue with the alignment of the buffers given to the
> block backends. In particular, at the moment we are allocating buffers
> 512 bytes aligned while the backend I am working on (block-vbd) needs
> page alignment.
>
There is no requirement for this. The block block-raw-posix backend
deals with bouncing the buffers if it has to. A few places do
qemu_memalign() allocs as an optimization to avoid the bouncing but it's
not strictly required.
> If you do not want to do that, another possible solution is to create a
> new function called "qemu_blockalign" that would be implemented as
> qemu_memalign(512, size);
This is fine, but this is purely an optimization, it cannot be relied
upon in the general case.
> so we don't have to write 512 bytes everywhere
> but only in one place, thus making life easier to people like me that
> have to change the value for a special case.
>
> Thanks in advance for your sympathy :)
>
Why does your backend requirement page alignment and who's notion of page?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Stefano Stabellini
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 13:35 [Qemu-devel] buffer alignment for block backends Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-08 18:53 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-04-09 9:57 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 13:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:54 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-09 15:21 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-09 16:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 16:13 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 16:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 15:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-09 16:15 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 17:29 ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-04-09 13:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:19 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:38 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-09 15:40 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 16:19 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 10:07 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 13:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-09 13:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DCF2C0.9070704@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).