From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lrcye-000290-Tj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:58:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LrcyZ-00020r-Os for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:58:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36027 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LrcyZ-00020X-Dr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:58:19 -0400 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.156]:15924) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LrcyZ-0007ws-1I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:58:19 -0400 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so156984ywk.82 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49DCF3C5.3080903@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:58:13 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: start qemu failed with --enable-kvm -vga std References: <49DCA2B0.2040509@codemonkey.ws> <5d6222a80904080625k4aa8186fo451772b70509f595@mail.gmail.com> <49DCD212.5050200@siemens.com> <5d6222a80904080941g5b4b9b7lfca2b854caeaf161@mail.gmail.com> <49DCD8AE.2090007@siemens.com> <5d6222a80904081006w65228ac7k3b6e759e08f4c8b3@mail.gmail.com> <49DCDCF8.50105@siemens.com> <5d6222a80904081025j1644b6bay17d1ff942247971@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80904081025j1644b6bay17d1ff942247971@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Glauber Costa Glauber Costa wrote: > > In all seriousness, no matter how good your series for improving kvm > registration > are, it is unlikely to hit the stable branch. So I believe a good deal > would have something > on the line of this patch applied to stable, leaving unstable as is, > until we can find a better > solution. > > What do you think, anthony? > As mentioned on IRC, we don't have this problem in stable. Regards, Anthony Liguori