From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] buffer alignment for block backends
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:30:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DDF87D.4070701@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49DDF4B4.1050609@codemonkey.ws>
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> If you do not want to do that, another possible solution is to create a
>>>> new function called "qemu_blockalign" that would be implemented as
>>>> qemu_memalign(512, size);
>>>>
>>> This is fine, but this is purely an optimization, it cannot be relied
>>> upon in the general case.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> If you are OK with this, a simple patch like the following is
>> acceptable, or do you prefer a more formal approach involving a new
>> function in the BlockDriver interface?
>>
>
> Yes, but that's not covering very many of the cases. There are still
> places where we allocate bounce buffers that aren't with memalign (like
> in block-qcow2.c). Also, please document what the new function does and
> when it should be used.
>
Ok, I'll try to find all those places.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-09 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 13:35 [Qemu-devel] buffer alignment for block backends Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-08 18:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 9:57 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 13:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:54 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-09 15:21 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-09 16:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 16:13 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 16:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 15:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-09 16:15 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 17:29 ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-04-09 13:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:19 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:38 ` Paul Brook
2009-04-09 15:40 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 16:19 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 10:07 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 13:30 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2009-04-09 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-09 13:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DDF87D.4070701@eu.citrix.com \
--to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).