qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] buffer alignment for block backends
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:30:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DDF87D.4070701@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49DDF4B4.1050609@codemonkey.ws>

Anthony Liguori wrote:

> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>   
>>>> If you do not want to do that, another possible solution is to create a
>>>> new function called "qemu_blockalign" that would be implemented as
>>>> qemu_memalign(512, size);
>>>>       
>>> This is fine, but this is purely an optimization, it cannot be relied 
>>> upon in the general case.
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>
>> If you are OK with this, a simple patch like the following is
>> acceptable, or do you prefer a more formal approach involving a new
>> function in the BlockDriver interface?
>>   
> 
> Yes, but that's not covering very many of the cases.  There are still 
> places where we allocate bounce buffers that aren't with memalign (like 
> in block-qcow2.c).  Also, please document what the new function does and 
> when it should be used.
> 

Ok, I'll try to find all those places.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-09 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-08 13:35 [Qemu-devel] buffer alignment for block backends Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-08 18:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09  9:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:11     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 13:30       ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:54         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-09 15:21           ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:46             ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:50             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-09 16:11               ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 16:13               ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 16:28               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 15:55             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-09 16:15               ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 17:29               ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-04-09 13:33       ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:19       ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:38         ` Paul Brook
2009-04-09 15:40           ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:56         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 16:19           ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 10:07   ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:14     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 13:30       ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2009-04-09 13:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-09 13:30       ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:31         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DDF87D.4070701@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).