From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LruLZ-00085b-Kg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:31:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LruLU-00082i-Vu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:31:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58876 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LruLU-00082c-SC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:31:08 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:52153) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LruLU-0007pH-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:31:08 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n39DRtxP027279 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:27:55 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n39DV5Pq178100 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:31:05 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n39DV50B015067 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:31:05 -0600 Message-ID: <49DDF897.1050604@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:31:03 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1239200204-4934-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1239200204-4934-2-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <20090408143335.GS18076@redhat.com> <49DCBCBE.6010102@redhat.com> <49DCE266.9080809@us.ibm.com> <49DDC390.9040004@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <49DDC390.9040004@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce monitor 'wait' command Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hollis Blanchard Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > Hmm. Why would you want to use -- say -- "wait 3" ? It probably will > be either "loop forever" or "single event" mode in practice. We might > also have a "single event, but don't block if there isn't any" mode. Yeah, I came to the same conclusion. We just need a wait-forever command. I'll have it in the next set of patches. -- Regards, Anthony Liguori