qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] buffer alignment for block backends
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:50:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DE193B.50703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090409152107.GE5457@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>

On 04/09/09 17:21, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann, le Thu 09 Apr 2009 15:54:34 +0200, a écrit :
>> On 04/09/09 15:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> The userspace\kernelspace distinction does not make much sense in
>>> minios, but yes it provides an interface to communicate with blkback in
>>> dom0. This interface is used by block-vbd in qemu instead of
>>> block-raw-posix when run in minios.
>> Sit back, look again.  Do you really need it being page-aligned?
>
> Page aligned is an optimization which comes for free when you can
> already choose the alignment.

Ok, so you don't have to.

Does it have an effect positive actually?  i.e. do you have requests 
which would fit into one page but actually span two due to the misalignment?

At least when watching the linux kernel access pattern I see larger 
requests being page aligned anyway.  Probably page cache reads and writes.

>> The xen block protocol can handle unaligned requests just fine.
>
> Not completely arbitrarily aligned requests. They need to be
> sector-aligned.

Agreed.  Sector-alignment you have anyway, thats why I didn't wrote that 
explicitly.

cheers,
   Gerd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-09 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-08 13:35 [Qemu-devel] buffer alignment for block backends Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-08 18:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09  9:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:11     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 13:30       ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:54         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-04-09 15:21           ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:46             ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:50             ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2009-04-09 16:11               ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 16:13               ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 16:28               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 15:55             ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-09 16:15               ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 17:29               ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-04-09 13:33       ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:19       ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:38         ` Paul Brook
2009-04-09 15:40           ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 15:56         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 16:19           ` Samuel Thibault
2009-04-09 10:07   ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:14     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-09 13:30       ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 13:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-09 13:30       ` Stefano Stabellini
2009-04-09 15:31         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DE193B.50703@redhat.com \
    --to=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).