From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LsaEb-0008HU-Hy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:14:49 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LsaEW-0008A4-KV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:14:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50499 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LsaEW-00089t-I5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:14:44 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:54552) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LsaEW-0000Ds-5N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:14:44 -0400 Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3D9FFC126B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:14:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [88.66.126.154] (helo=[192.168.1.2]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1LsaEV-0005Er-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:14:43 +0200 Message-ID: <49E06D8C.7000303@web.de> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:14:36 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0A57293F615B6E5BB18A395A" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm requires -cpu core2duo Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0A57293F615B6E5BB18A395A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, with latest svn, I'm unable to boot 64-bit linux guests in kvm mode with default settings. The guest grumbles about a missing 64-bit cpu. qemu in emulation mode is fine. I'm able to work around this by appending '-cpu core2duo' - my host cpu type. Is this a known limitation? Or a regression= ? Jan --------------enig0A57293F615B6E5BB18A395A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkngbZEACgkQniDOoMHTA+myAgCfXcDLdVb5+vhXbuycI4CHqUSl Em4An0Lx8a+FXCdD+R4AmFgqgUF0XYnT =RvXY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0A57293F615B6E5BB18A395A--