From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvaC5-0001aM-5p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:48:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LvaC0-0001VG-H8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:48:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55734 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LvaC0-0001V0-9P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:48:32 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:36180) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LvaBz-0007yE-Nx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:48:31 -0400 Received: from smtp06.web.de (fmsmtp06.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.172]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D1110042DFF for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:48:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [88.65.39.244] (helo=[192.168.1.123]) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1LvaBx-0005ie-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:48:29 +0200 Message-ID: <49EB55D8.7020903@web.de> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:48:24 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig49F9A0249BD525F426E4E7A4" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add file describing rules for submitting patches Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig49F9A0249BD525F426E4E7A4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Blue Swirl wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I gathered a few common complaints about patch submission, hopefully > not too much affected by my consumption of small amounts of various > alcoholic substances. Don't drink and patch. Oh, wait, this was: "Don't drink and derive!" So this is probably ok. >=20 > Comments, objections? SP3.2: If you only attach, pleeeease don't use base64 encoding etc. And there should be no maintainer exception... Jan --------------enig49F9A0249BD525F426E4E7A4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknrVdwACgkQniDOoMHTA+lckQCeNJc+SlmIX7Y529wTUw9uYk85 lSUAnjnrJ9YEAG0ay+2Cuw1JfUaPEIFs =pnGO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig49F9A0249BD525F426E4E7A4--