From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LyALs-0006Zz-PN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:49:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LyALo-0006Xx-7i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:49:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52686 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LyALo-0006Xt-0C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:49:20 -0400 Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.154]:41188) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LyALn-0004CV-Mv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:49:19 -0400 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so1071516yxn.82 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49F4BAB7.3010501@codemonkey.ws> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:49:11 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] branch and tag names References: <49F4A162.4000604@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <49F4A162.4000604@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Avi Kivity wrote: > Currently, tags and branch names carry their cvs heritage: > > release_0_10_0 > stable_0_10 And I even renamed them to make them less unslightly :-) They were something like svn/tags/release_0_10_0. > These are unsightly. Can we move to > > v0.10.0 > stable/0.10 v0.10.0 as a tag looks good to me. stable/0.10 feels a little awkward. I never have gotten quite used to this style of tagging (using file-like hierarchies). I'm not super opinionated about it either way. I'm interested to see what other people think. Regards, Anthony Liguori