From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LyKOP-0002IB-8j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:32:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LyKOJ-0002FW-Np for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:32:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38030 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LyKOJ-0002FT-KF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:32:35 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41514) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LyKOI-0008DO-VF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:32:35 -0400 Message-ID: <49F55180.7010105@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:32:32 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] branch and tag names References: <49F4A162.4000604@redhat.com> <49F4BAB7.3010501@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <49F4BAB7.3010501@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Anthony Liguori wrote: > > stable/0.10 feels a little awkward. I never have gotten quite used to > this style of tagging (using file-like hierarchies). It's useful if you have multiple categories of branches (personal development branches, formal maintenance branches, semi-formal branches for early sharing). Probably not so important for the master repository. > > I'm not super opinionated about it either way. Pity, it's even better bikeshedding material than directory layouts. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.